Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 3 authors, 2011-08-24
DORMANTno replies

[PATCH 4/6] ARM: mx31: use generic function for displaying silicon revision

From: Jason Liu <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-24 02:45:02

Hi, Sascha,

2011/8/23 Sascha Hauer [off-list ref]:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:07:42PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote:
quoted
Update to use generic function for displaying silicon revision

Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <redacted>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <redacted>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
?arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx31.c ? ? ? | ? ?5 +++--
?arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu-imx31.c ? ? ? ? | ? 21 +++++++++++++--------
?arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx3x.h | ? 11 ++---------
?3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx31.c
index d973770..dd8373e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx31.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-imx31.c
@@ -610,11 +610,12 @@ int __init mx31_clocks_init(unsigned long fref)
? ? ? clk_enable(&gpt_clk);
? ? ? clk_enable(&emi_clk);
- ? ? clk_enable(&iim_clk);

? ? ? clk_enable(&serial_pll_clk);

- ? ? mx31_read_cpu_rev();
+ ? ? clk_enable(&iim_clk);
+ ? ? imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX31", mx31_revision());
+ ? ? clk_disable(&iim_clk);

? ? ? if (mx31_revision() >= IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0) {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? reg = __raw_readl(MXC_CCM_PMCR1);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu-imx31.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu-imx31.c
index a378070..a5b8686 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu-imx31.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu-imx31.c
@@ -14,15 +14,14 @@
?#include <mach/hardware.h>
?#include <mach/iim.h>

-unsigned int mx31_cpu_rev;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mx31_cpu_rev);
+static int mx31_cpu_rev = -1;

?static struct {
? ? ? u8 srev;
? ? ? const char *name;
? ? ? const char *v;
? ? ? unsigned int rev;
-} mx31_cpu_type[] __initdata = {
+} mx31_cpu_type[] = {
? ? ? { .srev = 0x00, .name = "i.MX31(L)", .v = "1.0", ?.rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0 ?},
? ? ? { .srev = 0x10, .name = "i.MX31", ? ?.v = "1.1", ?.rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1 ?},
? ? ? { .srev = 0x11, .name = "i.MX31L", ? .v = "1.1", ?.rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1 ?},
@@ -34,7 +33,7 @@ static struct {
? ? ? { .srev = 0x29, .name = "i.MX31L", ? .v = "2.0", ?.rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0 ?},
?};

-void __init mx31_read_cpu_rev(void)
+static int mx31_read_cpu_rev(void)
?{
? ? ? u32 i, srev;
@@ -47,11 +46,17 @@ void __init mx31_read_cpu_rev(void)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "CPU identified as %s, silicon rev %s\n",
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? mx31_cpu_type[i].name, mx31_cpu_type[i].v);
It seems now we print the silicon revision twice, right?
Yes, correct. I will fix it.
The .v field should be unused now and can be removed.
Accepted.
Also, you can call imx_print_silicon_rev from here and pass the cpu name
from the array.
Yes, Thanks for the review.

Jason
Sascha
quoted
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? mx31_cpu_rev = mx31_cpu_type[i].rev;
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return mx31_cpu_type[i].rev;
? ? ? ? ? ? ? }

- ? ? mx31_cpu_rev = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
+ ? ? return IMX_CHIP_REVISION_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+int mx31_revision(void)
+{
+ ? ? if (mx31_cpu_rev == -1)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? mx31_cpu_rev = mx31_read_cpu_rev();

- ? ? printk(KERN_WARNING "Unknown CPU identifier. srev = %02x\n", srev);
+ ? ? return mx31_cpu_rev;
?}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mx31_revision);
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx3x.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx3x.h
index 388a407..e1850f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx3x.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/mx3x.h
@@ -187,15 +187,6 @@
?/* Mandatory defines used globally */

?#if !defined(__ASSEMBLY__) && !defined(__MXC_BOOT_UNCOMPRESS)
-
-extern unsigned int mx31_cpu_rev;
-extern void mx31_read_cpu_rev(void);
-
-static inline int mx31_revision(void)
-{
- ? ? return mx31_cpu_rev;
-}
-
?extern unsigned int mx35_cpu_rev;
?extern void mx35_read_cpu_rev(void);
@@ -203,6 +194,8 @@ static inline int mx35_revision(void)
?{
? ? ? return mx35_cpu_rev;
?}
+
+extern int mx31_revision(void);
?#endif

?#endif /* ifndef __MACH_MX3x_H__ */
--
1.7.4.1

--
Pengutronix e.K. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |
Industrial Linux Solutions ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | http://www.pengutronix.de/ ?|
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 ? ?|
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 ? ? ? ? ? | Fax: ? +49-5121-206917-5555 |

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help