On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

quoted

On Sunday 14 August 2011, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

Hi Arnd,

Please pull the first set of tegra/board patches for 3.2:


The following changes since commit e6a99d312687a42c077a9b8cb5e757f186edb1b9:

 Merge branch 'slab/urgent' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6
(2011-08-09 08:42:16 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/olof/tegra.git boards-for-3.2

Hi Olof,

The contents all look good, but I'm undecided whether we should have
branches that are not based on a -rc release. In your case, it's
halfway between -rc1 and -rc2.

Do others have an opinion? If we decide to take development branches
only when they are based on a proper -rc, I'll do the simple rebase
of the patches and push them out, otherwise I'll push them as they are.

Although this might be a nicety, I personally don't particularly care 
about the base being set on a tag. I think that keeping the original 
committer info intact is more valuable.

Right. In general having a devel branch based on a tag is a good
thing, but as long as it's not some random commit from the middle of
the merge window, it's fine.

Thanks,

	tglx