On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Tixy wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:19 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
quoted
This patch is useful for debugging, but I'm not convinced it should
be merged.
[...]
quoted
static inline int __pure cpu_architecture(void)
{
- BUG_ON(__cpu_architecture == CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN);
- return __cpu_architecture;
+ if (unlikely(__cpu_architecture == CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN)) {
+ extern int __pure __get_cpu_architecture(void);
+
+ WARN_ONCE(1, "__cpu_architecture not set yet!\n");
+ return __get_cpu_architecture();
+ } else
+ return __cpu_architecture;
}
Seems to me that if we go down this route, cpu_architecture() may as
well remain a non-inline function which just calculates the arch if it's
not already set...
My thought as well.
if (unlikely(__cpu_architecture == CPU_ARCH_UNKNOWN))
__cpu_architecture = __get_cpu_architecture();
return __cpu_architecture;
There seems to be too many ways to skin this cat :-)
Agreed.
Nicolas