Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 7 authors, 2011-08-15

GPMI-NAND Status?

From: Huang Shijie <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-09 10:54:43

Hi,
quoted
quoted
DMA timeouts [1]
================

[    2.560000] [ start_dma_without_bch_irq : 392 ] DMA timeout, last DMA :1
[    3.560000] [ start_dma_with_bch_irq : 427 ] bch timeout!!!

Always reproducible by me when trying to format mtd0. Sometimes(always?) seen
by Koen during boot (on read?). Never seen by Huang? It is currently unclear if
After I used a different .config, it never appears in my side.
So, you have a config which triggers this? That should be useful for
debugging. What do you need to enable to see this?
My old config is made by myself. I think it was a wrong config,
and it had too much difference from the config made by 'make mxs_defconfig".

So i think it's has no use for debugging.



quoted
Please test the driver again when you back to office.
Pay attention to your version of /arch/arm/configs/mxs_defconfig.
Your mxs_defconfig may miss Shawn Guo's patches.
I have all the correct patches, I triple-checked that. Regarding the
config, I am not looking for a config that works, I want my config to
work. I meanwhile have the feeling this is a bug in the DMA driver
(because Aisheng Dong has DMA problems, too, in the audio path), still
we need to be sure.
it's not a DMA bug, I discuss with Koen, and make sure that the bug is
caused by the GPMI or BCH.

it's a different bug from  Aisheng Dong's bug.
quoted
quoted
problem overwriting all-0xff data in NAND [2]
=============================================

Although it occured only when writing JFFS2 images so far, this is a generic
issue and needs to be fixed, right?
Artem said it should not change the driver, but the upper layer(jffs2).

So I think i do not need to change the driver.
OK, read it again, got it now. Agreed.

quoted
quoted
* custom sysfs-entries
My sysfs-entries is in the GPMI-NAND directory.
Does be a mainline driver means I should not have any sysfs-entries?
If it does, i can remove it.
It is some kund of ABI, so we would have to support them forever. If
there is no really strong reason to have them, it is better to remove
them.
ok, thanks.
quoted
quoted
* custom kernel command line parameters
The kernel command line 'gpmi_nand' is to avoid the conflict with
other modules such as
SD.

If it's be removed, I have to use different config to resolve the
issue which is not better either. :(
This is a board-specific issue, so you should handle this at
board-level, not at driver level.
I wish to handle it at the board level.

But I have no idea how to solve the conflict between GPMI and SD.  :(

Could you give me some hint?
thanks
quoted
quoted
* namespacing (some functions have no prefix, some have "mil_", some have mx23)
   (I think 'mil' means 'mtd interface layer', but why is that needed?)
The mil is used to make the gpmi_nand_data{} simple.
Without it, the gpmi_nand_data{} will very big.

The functions which have mx23 prefix are only used in mx23.
The functions which have no prefix can used in both mx28 and mx23.
I understood this, but wonder if mx23_* specific stuff has to be in the
main driver. Will have a closer look to the driver this week, then I can
say more.
thanks
quoted
quoted
Complexity
==========

The driver is not easy to review. I wonder if it makes sense to use incremental
patches for it? maybe making it a staging driver could be a solution for that?
Frankly speaking, the current driver is maybe the smallest version now.

I even do not add the on-chip BBT feature now.
OK.
quoted
quoted
Huang, are you interested in accepting patches or do you prefer we just point
at certain code and you then fix it? Starting with a simpler driver and then
Feel free to mail me the patch. it's welcome.
We'd need a branch somewhere for that, so we have a history.
ok.
I will try to find some solution.
quoted
quoted
adding stuff might be another option if we can't chase all the bugs in the
current driver.

That being said, I'd think fixing the DMA issue has prio #1 and maybe we can
meet in IRC or something to work that out? Is there interest in that?
What about gtalk?
Definately not my favourite, but seems like Koen and you already use it.
Might try it...
I can use the IRC too.

Huang Shijie
Regards,

     Wolfram
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help