Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2011-08-03
DORMANTno replies

[PATCH 2/2] I2C: OMAP: remove dev->idle, use usage counting provided by runtime PM

From: Felipe Balbi <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-03 22:36:05
Also in: linux-i2c, linux-omap

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 11:09:20AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Current usage of runtime PM is not quite correct.  The actual
idle/unidle of the I2C hardware should not happen until the runtime PM
callbacks are called.  Therefore, change omap_i2c_[un]idle() functions
to only be called from the runtime PM callbacks (when usage count
transitions to/from zero.)

Also, the runtime PM core does usage counting and replaces
functionality currently managed by the dev->idle flag.  Remove usage
of dev->idle in favor of using runtime PM, and checking status using
pm_runtime_suspended().

Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <redacted>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |   58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 12d0cbc..1b5325b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -194,7 +194,6 @@ struct omap_i2c_dev {
 						 */
 	u8			rev;
 	unsigned		b_hw:1;		/* bad h/w fixes */
-	unsigned		idle:1;
 	u16			iestate;	/* Saved interrupt register */
 	u16			pscstate;
 	u16			scllstate;
@@ -269,12 +268,8 @@ static void omap_i2c_unidle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct omap_i2c_bus_platform_data *pdata;
 
-	WARN_ON(!dev->idle);
-
 	pdata = dev->dev->platform_data;
 
-	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
-
 	if (pdata->flags & OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE) {
 		omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
 		omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG, dev->pscstate);
@@ -285,7 +280,6 @@ static void omap_i2c_unidle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
 		omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_WE_REG, dev->westate);
 		omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
 	}
-	dev->idle = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Don't write to this register if the IE state is 0 as it can
@@ -300,8 +294,6 @@ static void omap_i2c_idle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
 	struct omap_i2c_bus_platform_data *pdata;
 	u16 iv;
 
-	WARN_ON(dev->idle);
-
 	pdata = dev->dev->platform_data;
 
 	dev->iestate = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG);
@@ -315,12 +307,9 @@ static void omap_i2c_idle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
 	} else {
 		omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG, dev->iestate);
 
-		/* Flush posted write before the dev->idle store occurs */
+		/* Flush posted write */
 		omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG);
 	}
-	dev->idle = 1;
-
-	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev->dev);
 }
 
 static int omap_i2c_init(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
@@ -644,7 +633,7 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
 	int i;
 	int r;
 
-	omap_i2c_unidle(dev);
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
 
 	r = omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(dev);
 	if (r < 0)
@@ -667,7 +656,7 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
 
 	omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(dev);
 out:
-	omap_i2c_idle(dev);
+	pm_runtime_put_sync(dev->dev);
I wonder if these pm_runtime_put need to be synchronous ? Could we just
call pm_runtime_put() instead ? Ditto to all other.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1140,6 +1128,36 @@ omap_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
+static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+	struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
what happened to dev_get_drvdata(dev) ??
+	omap_i2c_idle(_dev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+	struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
ditto
+	omap_i2c_unidle(_dev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct dev_pm_ops omap_i2c_pm_ops = {
+	.runtime_suspend = omap_i2c_runtime_suspend,
+	.runtime_resume = omap_i2c_runtime_resume,
+};
+#define OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS (&omap_i2c_pm_ops)
+#else
+#define OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS NULL
+#endif
OMAP_I2C_PM_OPS isn't used anywhere ??

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110804/fd9aec0c/attachment-0001.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help