Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-08-25

How to handle named resources with DT?

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-25 10:28:24
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:16:14AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
on top of all that, for IPs which are used on many SoCs (such as MUSB)
it's quite silly to force all users to provide resources in a certain
order. It sounds to me that this will be prone to error in many ways
until everything is synced up and on the correct order.

Ditching _byname is a very bad idea.
I continue to disagree.  The current _byname is an abonimation and hack
to try to "fix" this problem.

_byname should have been implemented differently - rather than overriding
the resources name field (which is _normally_ specified to be the device
or driver name), a new field should have been introduced in struct resource
to carry the resource sub-name (which is really what it is.)

That would have avoided making /proc/iomem completely illegible with
multiple devices using this feature.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help