Jamie Iles wrote at Wednesday, August 17, 2011 5:47 AM:
To avoid going too far in the wrong direction I thought I'd post what I
have so far for a generic pinmux binding. Essentially it's just
Stephen's nvidia binding but with the nvidia specifics abstracted out so
the common loop can be used for other platforms. This approach works
nicely for picoxcell too.
For more esoteric bindings, such as pull strength, these could be
handled in the platform specific configuration function.
Thanks very much. These patches look sane to me. I'll pick them up in my
local tree, enhance them to support the pins/additional-pins property that
I just mentioned in a separate email, retest and repost.
This doesn't address the runtime muxing that LinusW's set of patches do,
and I'm not sure how to handle that.
I see that LinusW just posted another version of this. I'll go check that
out too, in case it has any impact on these patches.
--
nvpublic