On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:07:55 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
@@ -87,7 +88,8 @@ static int __devinit sram_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
info->sram_phys = (phys_addr_t)res->start;
info->sram_size = resource_size(res);
- info->sram_virt = ioremap(info->sram_phys,
info->sram_size);
+ info->sram_virt = __arm_ioremap(info->sram_phys,
info->sram_size,
+ MT_MEMORY);
Not a good idea fiddling about under the covers like that. The reason
that MT_MEMORY is not in asm/io.h is to stop it being used like this -
MT_MEMORY etc are not meant for general purpose use.
It needs to be looked at properly rather than working behind the APIs,
and making my life a misery by doing so, preventing me from making
changes where necessary by this kind of back-door use.
I guess we need a new ioremap_xxx() variant to cope with this.
Something like ioremap_exec()? I have no idea what the related MT_
entry would be (as someone who's new to the ARM world, it's not
entirely clear what the semantic distinctions are between the various
MT_ entries).