Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 7 authors, 2011-08-23

[RFC PATCH v2 03/13] arm/tegra: board-dt: Add AUXDATA for tegra-gpio and tegra-pinmux

From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-16 20:24:27
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-tegra, lkml

Shawn Guo wrote at Monday, August 15, 2011 9:31 PM:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:28:10PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
Add AUXDATA so that Tegra GPIO and pinmux devices that are instantiated
from device-tree are named consistently with the static platform devices
in mach-tegra/devices.c. Note that the device-tree file tegra20.dtsi
already includes a node for the Tegra GPIO controller, whereas the node
for the Tegra pinmux controller will be added in a subsequent commit.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
index 9f47e04..1995b79 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-dt.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ void seaboard_pinmux_init(void);


 struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
+	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-gpio", TEGRA_GPIO_BASE, "tegra-gpio", NULL),
+	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-pinmux", TEGRA_APB_MISC_BASE, "tegra-pinmux", NULL),
 	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-sdhci", TEGRA_SDMMC1_BASE, "sdhci-tegra.0", NULL),
 	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-sdhci", TEGRA_SDMMC2_BASE, "sdhci-tegra.1", NULL),
 	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-sdhci", TEGRA_SDMMC3_BASE, "sdhci-tegra.2", NULL),
The whole auxdata table was primarily added to keep clk API working
with the device name looking up.  Your gpio and pinmux can still work
without this patch, right?  If that's case, I do not think we need to
have this patch just for consistent device name between dt and non-dt.
They are not and they do not have to be.
Indeed, everything does work fine without the AUXDATA; there's no
dependence on any clock lookups or similar in the new drivers.

Initially, I thought consistency in device naming would be important,
since Tegra works with and without device-tree, but I guess we'll be able
to turn off the hard-coded board files soon, so device name consistency
probably isn't too relevant.

I'll drop this patch.

-- 
nvpublic
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help