On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Chris Ball [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:

quoted

it seems this series got lost in time, at least patches 01, 02, 03,
04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12 look like valid standalone fixes and
improvements to me, they don't touch other trees and still apply
cleanly, so would be good to have.

Yeah. ?I didn't merge them because Tony still has unanswered comments on
the OMAP side of the patches, and they're submitted as a single patchset.

I've applied {2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12} to mmc-next for 3.1 now. ?1 doesn't
apply because the function doesn't exist anymore. ?4 doesn't apply
because iclk doesn't exist anymore.

If someone wants to look at rebasing the rest of these against mmc-next
and resubmitting, I think that'd be useful.

Thanks! 1 and 4 seem to be unneeded any more (I was trying them on
linux-next, not noticing it was not updated for a while), and others
have comments pending, so it's all done.

Thanks,

- Chris.
--
Chris Ball ? [off-list ref] ? <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

-- 
Gra?vydas