Ben Dooks [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:00:56PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted
Hi Ben,
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:15 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
quoted
Ping. I don't see this in linux-next yet.
Are you planning to queue this for v3.1?
Oops, pushed send too soon on this...
As this series touches various data files in arch/arm/mach-omap2/* and
we have a handful of other changes to that data for this merge window, I
think it would be better for conflict avoidance if this series is merged
via Tony's linux-omap tree.
With your Ack, we'll merge it via OMAP.
I see that the same day I sent this, you merged it into your next-i2c
branch. Guess I was too late with my request.
As I mentioned above, we will have several conflicts with the
arch/arm/mach-omap2 changes in this series, so we would prefer to merge
them via the OMAP tree if at all possible so we can properly handle the
conflicts.
Do you mind dropping it from your next-i2c so we can merge it via
linux-omap (with your Ack.)
Yes, and if you could indicate all the other omap i2c patches and I'll
add my ack to yours.
Acked-by: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Thanks, I will refresh/repost any remaining OMAP I2C patches today and
let you know.
Kevin