Grant Likely wrote:

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 07:51:10PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

"Grant" == Grant Likely [off-list ref] writes:

 >> Great, will you handle the series or should it go through the spi

tree?

quoted

 Grant> With the big spi driver rename, it should probably either go via

the

quoted

 Grant> spi tree, or be put into a topic branch that can be merged by

both the

quoted

 Grant> spi and samsung trees.

Both is fine by me. Let me know if you want me to do something.

It's pretty minimal arch/arm impact, and it depends on the big rename
patch, so why don't I just merge it directly into spi/next without a
topic branch.

Hi Grant,

I agree with you, it is not expected this makes some conflicts between spi
and samsung tree.

I think Ben's ack is enough on this, if required,
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <redacted>

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim [off-list ref], Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.