[PATCH 2/2] serial/imx: add device tree probe support
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-04 09:05:27
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-serial
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:58:20AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:quoted
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 03:56:00PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
It adds device tree probe support for imx tty/serial driver. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu <redacted> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <redacted> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Cc: Alan Cox <redacted> Cc: Grant Likely <redacted> --- .../bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt | 19 +++++ drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txtdiff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9c0406 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/tty/serial/fsl-imx-uart.txt@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +* Freescale i.MX Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (UART) + +Required properties: +- compatible : Should be "fsl,<soc>-uart" +- reg : Address and length of the register set for the device +- interrupts : Should contain uart interrupt + +Optional properties: +- fsl,uart-has-rtscts : Indicate the uart has rts and cts +- fsl,irda-mode : Indicate the uart supports irda mode + +Example: + +uart at 73fbc000 { + compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart"; + reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>; + interrupts = <31>; + fsl,uart-has-rtscts; +};diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c index 983f3bd..483c447 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/rational.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <asm/io.h> #include <asm/irq.h>@@ -239,6 +241,12 @@ static struct platform_device_id imx_uart_devtype[] = { } }; +static struct of_device_id imx_uart_dt_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX1_UART], }, + { .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +};Isn't this table a bit too small? What about the other SoCs?I'd expect that using fsl,imx21-uart on imx51 would result in a working port, but it feels stange and if that's the intention the example above needs fixing.
Here is what I have in dts file for uart. The 'compatible' tells
that it's a imx51-uart and compatible with imx21-uart.
uart0: uart at 73fbc000 {
compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", "fsl,imx21-uart";
reg = <0x73fbc000 0x4000>;
interrupts = <31>;
fsl,uart-has-rtscts;
};
I did not buy it until I got convinced by Grant here [1]. We do not
need this long table until there are some soc specific thing to
distinguish. Currently, they are all compatible with imx21-uart and
share imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART].
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx21-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx25-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx27-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx31-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx35-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx50-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx51-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
{ .compatible = "fsl,imx53-uart", .data = &imx_uart_devdata[IMX2_UART], },
[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/198935
--
Regards,
Shawn