On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jamie Iles [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:36:53AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:

Hi Will,

quoted

Russell,

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:26:22AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:40:00PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:

quoted

can be used similarly (the macros make entries look identical apart from the
{plat,of} prefix). This allows us to stop (ab)using platform_device::id, and
should allow for easier addition/modification of PMU driver bindings.

BSPs need no longer care about the Type of PMUs they register; as long as a
binding exists the type will be assigned correctly.

Could someone please look at adding an entry to the MAINTAINERS file
for the ARM PMU stuff, so we know who should be looking after this stuff?

I'm happy to maintain this stuff if nobody has any objections.

No objections from me, I think that sounds like a very good idea!

No objections! I would be glad to lend a hand if neeeded!

Regards,
Jean

Jamie

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel