On 06/25/11 21:10, Koen Kooi wrote:

Op 25 jun 2011, om 20:51 heeft Premi, Sanjeev het volgende geschreven:

quoted

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org 
[mailto:linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 1:47 PM
To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org List
Cc: linux-arm-kernel; Paul Walmsley
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: beagle: Use GPTIMERi 1 for clockevents


Op 24 jun 2011, om 18:23 heeft Sanjeev Premi het volgende geschreven:

quoted

The current selection of the GPTIMER on was result of
a hardware issue in early versions of the Beagleboards
(Ax and B1 thru B4). [1] [2]

Its been long since the hardware issue has been fixed.
This patch uses GPTIMER 1 for all newer board revisions
incl. Beagleboard XM.

[sp] I didn't include a reason - because the problem may not
    be reproducible on the public trees.

    During tests performed in internal development trees, the
    BogoMIPS calculations @ 1GHz wouldn't go beyond "830-850"
    range. While there was no such inconsistency on OMAP3EVM.

    After few days of debug GPTIMER12 came to be only difference.
    Tracing GPTIMER12 in the spec proved quite a challenge; the
    as timer is not included in the TRM and corresponding interrupt
    is marked reserved. Paul (in cc:) obviously had access to
    documents that we don't.

    This patch is merely trying to bring parity in use of GPTIMER
    across OMAP3 boards (AND use documented IP) - taking note of
    many Beagleboards where current code is necessary.

I get a value of 1010 ?10 bogoMIPS consistently with .39 + dvfs
patches. Having said that, this patch does seem to be an improvement,
but has it actually been tested on real beagleboard hardware with a
recent kernel? Especially on the boards affected by the capacitor
issue on the external clock.--

Hi Koen,

Probably obvious to anyone else here, but which dvfs patches?

I've only recently acquired an xm and hence wasn't following these threads.
Don't suppose you could point me to a tree with them in or the relevant
thread?

Cheers,

Jonathan