Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-06-21

[RFC][PATCH 1/5] USB: DWC OTG: Modification in DWC OTG driver for ARM based SoCs.

From: Praveen Paneri <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-21 12:00:24
Also in: linux-samsung-soc

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:18 PM, PRAVEEN PANERI [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:33:43PM +0530, p.paneri at samsung.com wrote:
quoted
From: Praveen Paneri

This patch modifies DWC OTG for ARM based SoCs. Currently it has
been tested for Samsung S5P6440. Can easily be built for others
as well.

Following features are tested for basic functions on SMDK6440
board after modifications:
OTG HOST: HID and mass-storage
OTG DEVICE: mass-storage and adb

Signed-off-by: Praveen Paneri
this is wrong is so many levels... We shouldn't be adding ifdefs to
allow the driver to be compiled for multiple architectures. The correct
way to handle this, is to phase out the core driver from the SoC- or
PCI-specific parts and make that a glue layer that bridges to the core
driver.
As I said this is just to show the changes required in this driver
to port it for ARM. Interest is in having single driver for both host and
gadget and make use of the OTG feature as it has been provided by
the IP.
 Will implement it in a better possible way.
Thanks

Paneri
I'm writing the driver for a similar core, the DWC USB3, take a look at
my dwc3 branch [1] to see how this should be done.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c b/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c
index ffbe6dd..b0dcae9 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c
@@ -50,9 +50,6 @@
?? * this file system to perform diagnostics on the driver components or the
?? * device.
?? */
-
-#include
-
??#include "driver.h"

??#define DWC_DRIVER_VERSION "1.05"
@@ -110,6 +107,9 @@ static int __devexit dwc_otg_driver_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
??{
?? struct device *dev = &ofdev->dev;
?? struct dwc_otg_device *dwc_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
+ struct s5p_otg_platdata *pdata = ofdev->dev.platform_data;
+#endif
NAK
quoted
@@ -152,6 +152,11 @@ static int __devexit dwc_otg_driver_remove(struct platform_device *ofdev)
?? /* Clear the drvdata pointer. */
?? dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
+ /* OTG Phy off */
+ if (pdata && pdata->phy_exit)
+ pdata->phy_exit(ofdev, S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE);
+#endif
NAK
quoted
@@ -169,12 +174,14 @@ static int __devinit dwc_otg_driver_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
?? int retval;
?? struct dwc_otg_device *dwc_dev;
?? struct device *dev = &ofdev->dev;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
+ struct s5p_otg_platdata *pdata = ofdev->dev.platform_data;
+#endif
NAK
quoted
@@ -182,15 +189,24 @@ static int __devinit dwc_otg_driver_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
?? goto fail_dwc_dev;
?? }

+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
+ /* OTG Phy init */
+ if (pdata && pdata->phy_init)
+ pdata->phy_init(ofdev, S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE);
+#endif
?? /* Retrieve the memory and IRQ resources. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
+ dwc_dev->irq = ofdev->resource[1].start;
+#else
?? dwc_dev->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(ofdev->dev.of_node, 0);
+#endif
NAK
quoted
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARM
NAK
quoted
@@ -200,8 +216,14 @@ static int __devinit dwc_otg_driver_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
?? dev_dbg(dev, "OTG - ioresource_mem start0x%llx: end:0x%llx\n",
?? (unsigned long long)res.start, (unsigned long long)res.end);

+
?? dwc_dev->phys_addr = res.start;
?? dwc_dev->base_len = res.end - res.start + 1;
+#else
+ dwc_dev->phys_addr = ofdev->resource[0].start;
+ dwc_dev->base_len = ofdev->resource[0].end -
+ ofdev->resource[0].start + 1;
+#endif
NAK
quoted
@@ -296,6 +318,7 @@ static int __devinit dwc_otg_driver_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
?? dwc_dev->hcd = NULL;
?? goto fail_hcd;
?? }
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARM
NAK
quoted
@@ -316,6 +339,7 @@ static int __devinit dwc_otg_driver_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
?? dwc_dev->hcd->cp_irq_installed = 1;
?? }
?? }
+#endif
NAK
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc/cil.h b/drivers/usb/dwc/cil.h
index 80b7da5..c1a11f1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc/cil.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc/cil.h
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@
??#if !defined(__DWC_CIL_H__)
??#define __DWC_CIL_H__
??#include
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#include
+#else
+#include
+#endif
I can't even say how ugly this is.
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc/param.c b/drivers/usb/dwc/param.c
index 523f0db..b48c510 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc/param.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc/param.c
@@ -116,8 +116,12 @@ static int set_valid_tx_fifo_sizes(struct core_if *core_if)
?? * This function is called during module intialization to verify that
?? * the module parameters are in a valid state.
?? */
-int __devinit check_parameters(struct core_if *core_if)
+int __devinit check_parameters(struct core_if *core_if,
+ struct platform_device *ofdev)
??{
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
+ struct s5p_otg_platdata *pdata = ofdev->dev.platform_data;
+#endif
NAK.
quoted
@@ -145,6 +149,23 @@ int __devinit check_parameters(struct core_if *core_if)
?? */
?? dwc_otg_module_params.enable_dynamic_fifo =
?? ????DWC_HWCFG2_DYN_FIFO_RD(core_if->hwcfg2);
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
+ if (pdata && pdata->dev_rx_fifo_size)
+ dwc_otg_module_params.dev_rx_fifo_size =
+ pdata->dev_rx_fifo_size;
+ if (pdata && pdata->dev_nptx_fifo_size)
+ dwc_otg_module_params.dev_nperio_tx_fifo_size =
+ pdata->dev_nptx_fifo_size;
+
+ if (pdata && pdata->host_rx_fifo_size)
+ dwc_otg_module_params.host_rx_fifo_size =
+ pdata->host_rx_fifo_size;
+ if (pdata && pdata->host_nptx_fifo_size)
+ dwc_otg_module_params.host_nperio_tx_fifo_size =
+ pdata->host_nptx_fifo_size;
+ if (pdata && pdata->host_ch_num)
+ dwc_otg_module_params.host_channels = pdata->host_ch_num;
+#else
then let's say another company licenses this core from Synopsys. Will
you add another pre-processor directive here ?


[1]
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git;a=tree;f=drivers/usb/dwc3;h=6ace38c51cfab18de3be257f86ae2c9afabf8237;hb=refs/heads/dwc3

--
balbi




Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help