[PATCH 2/8] ARM: dma-mapping: implement dma_map_single on top of dma_map_page
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2011-06-27 14:53:55
Also in:
linux-arch, linux-mm
On Monday 27 June 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On Friday, June 24, 2011 5:24 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Monday 20 June 2011, Marek Szyprowski wrote:quoted
quoted
This also breaks dmabounce when used with a highmem-enabled system - dmabounce refuses the dma_map_page() API but allows thedma_map_single()quoted
quoted
API.I really not sure how this change will break dma bounce code. Does it mean that it is allowed to call dma_map_single() on kmapped HIGH_MEM page?dma_map_single on a kmapped page already doesn't work, the argument needs to be inside of the linear mapping in order for virt_to_page to work.Then I got really confused. Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt says that dma_map_single() can be used only with kernel linear mapping, while dma_map_page() can be also called on HIGHMEM pages.
Right, this is true in general.
Now, lets go to arch/arm/common/dmabounce.c code:
dma_addr_t __dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
unsigned long offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
dev_dbg(dev, "%s(page=%p,off=%#lx,size=%zx,dir=%x)\n",
__func__, page, offset, size, dir);
BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir));
if (PageHighMem(page)) {
dev_err(dev, "DMA buffer bouncing of HIGHMEM pages "
"is not supported\n");
return ~0;
}
return map_single(dev, page_address(page) + offset, size, dir);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__dma_map_page);
Am I right that there is something mixed here? I really don't get why there is
high mem check in dma_map_page implementation. dma_map_single doesn't perform
such check and works with kmapped highmem pages...
Russell also pointed that my patch broke dma bounch with high mem enabled.
The version of __dma_map_page that you cited is the one used with dmabounce
enabled, when CONFIG_DMABOUNCE is disabled, the following version is used:
static inline dma_addr_t __dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
unsigned long offset, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
__dma_page_cpu_to_dev(page, offset, size, dir);
return pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page)) + offset;
}
This does not have the check, because the kernel does not need to touch
the kernel mapping in that case.
If you pass a kmapped page into dma_map_single, it should also not
work because of the BUG_ON in ___dma_single_cpu_to_dev -- it warns
you that you would end up flushing the cache for the wrong page (if any).
Arnd