Thread (48 messages) 48 messages, 10 authors, 2011-06-24

[PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support

From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-23 00:07:11
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml, netdev

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:52:11AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
- ? ? ? line = of_get_property(node, "id", NULL);
- ? ? ? if (!line)
+ ? ? ? line = of_get_device_index(node, "serial");
+ ? ? ? if (IS_ERR_VALUE(line))
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -ENODEV;
Personally, it an alias isn't present, then I'd dynamically assign a port id.
We probably can not. ?The driver works with being told the correct
port id which is defined by soc. ?Instead of dynamically assigning
a port id, we have to tell the driver the exact hardware port id of
the device that is being probed.
Are you sure?  It doesn't look like the driver behaviour uses id for
anything other than an index into the statically allocated serial port
instance table.  I don't see any change of behaviour based on the port
number anywhere.
Sorry, I did not make this clear.  In serial_imx_probe(), the port
gets created and then saved as below.

	imx_ports[sport->port.line] = sport;

While in imx_console_setup(), it addresses the port as following.

	sport = imx_ports[co->index];

When users specify their console as ttymxc0, they mean they are
using the first i.mx uart hardware port, in turn ttymxc1 for the
second port ...

That said, imx_port[0] has to be the first hardware port, imx_port[1]
has to be the second one ...  That's why port id sport->port.line
can not be dynamically assigned, otherwise console may not work.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help