On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 20 June 2011 22:28:49 Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
On Monday 20 June 2011 19:39:34 Alexander Holler wrote:
quoted
That packed without an additional aligned() caused errors on ARM with
gcc 4.6 is another problem which got (currently) fixed by removing packed.
Packed caused errors because it is *wrong*. The code as it was used undefined
behavior in the language.
I wouldn't call this issue as such, but this is a Red herring.
Could you please provide a pointer to the structure definition so a
second opinion to the usefulness of __packed there could be provided?
The structures in question are ehci_caps, ehci_regs and ehci_dbg_port.
OK. If anyone was still entertaining any doubts, those structures do
not require any packed attribute what so ever.
The patch that remove the __packed attribute was 139540170 "USB: ehci:
remove structure packing from ehci_def".
Too late for this, but for the record:
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <redacted>
Hopefully this thread still gathered enough wisdom about proper usage of
the packed and aligned attributes into the list archive.
Nicolas