[PATCH 07/15] OMAP: GPIO: handle save/restore ctx in GPIO driver
From: Kevin Hilman <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-25 22:33:51
Also in:
linux-omap
Tarun Kanti DebBarma [off-list ref] writes:
From: Charulatha V <redacted> Modify omap_gpio_prepare_for_idle() & omap_gpio_resume_after_idle() functions to handle save context & restore context respectively in the OMAP GPIO driver itself instead of calling these functions from pm specific files. For this, in gpio_prepare_for_idle(), use omap_device_get_context_loss_count() and in gpio_resume_after_idle() call it again. If the count is different, do restore context. context lost count is modified in omap_sram_idle() path when pwrdm_post_transition() is called. But pwrdm_post_transition() is called only after omap_gpio_resume_after_idle() is called. Hence correct this so that context lost count is modified before calling omap_gpio_resume_after_idle().
This change to modify where pwrdm_post_transition() is called should be separated out into a dedicated patch.
quoted hunk
omap_gpio_prepare_for_idle() & omap_gpio_resume_after_idle() do nothing if none of the GPIOs in a bank is being used. Also remove usage of cpu_is_* checks from the above mentioned functions and fix the multi-line comment style Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 22 +---- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h | 2 - drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c index 0c5e3a4..682d147 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c@@ -91,16 +91,6 @@ static struct powerdomain *mpu_pwrdm, *neon_pwrdm; static struct powerdomain *core_pwrdm, *per_pwrdm; static struct powerdomain *cam_pwrdm; -static inline void omap3_per_save_context(void) -{ - omap_gpio_save_context(); -} - -static inline void omap3_per_restore_context(void) -{ - omap_gpio_restore_context(); -} - static void omap3_enable_io_chain(void) { int timeout = 0;@@ -395,8 +385,10 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void) if (!is_suspending()) if (per_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON || core_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) - if (!console_trylock()) + if (!console_trylock()) { + pwrdm_post_transition(); goto console_still_active; + }
Rather than having to add an extra post_transition call, I think i best to move the pre_transition call down to just before the following /* PER */ block.
quoted hunk
/* PER */ if (per_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) {@@ -404,8 +396,6 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void) omap_uart_prepare_idle(2); omap_uart_prepare_idle(3); omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(per_going_off); - if (per_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) - omap3_per_save_context(); } /* CORE */@@ -467,12 +457,12 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void) } omap3_intc_resume_idle(); + pwrdm_post_transition(); + /* PER */ if (per_next_state < PWRDM_POWER_ON) { per_prev_state = pwrdm_read_prev_pwrst(per_pwrdm); omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(); - if (per_prev_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) - omap3_per_restore_context(); omap_uart_resume_idle(2); omap_uart_resume_idle(3); }@@ -490,8 +480,6 @@ console_still_active: omap3_disable_io_chain(); } - pwrdm_post_transition(); - clkdm_allow_idle(mpu_pwrdm->pwrdm_clkdms[0]); }diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h index 64b1ee7..5718a45 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h@@ -209,8 +209,6 @@ extern void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(int off_mode); extern void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void); extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce(int gpio, int enable); extern void omap_set_gpio_debounce_time(int gpio, int enable); -extern void omap_gpio_save_context(void); -extern void omap_gpio_restore_context(void); /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* Wrappers for "new style" GPIO calls, using the new infrastructurediff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c index 9d55b7d..bc02ec5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <plat/omap_device.h> +
Should not be needed. More on this below.
quoted hunk
#include <mach/hardware.h> #include <asm/irq.h> #include <mach/irqs.h>@@ -72,6 +74,7 @@ struct gpio_bank { bool loses_context; int stride; u32 width; + u32 ctx_lost_cnt_before;
Please call this ctx_loss_count.
quoted hunk
u16 id; void (*set_dataout)(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable);@@ -1310,6 +1313,9 @@ static struct sys_device omap_gpio_device = { #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS +static void omap_gpio_save_context(struct gpio_bank *bank); +static void omap_gpio_restore_context(struct gpio_bank *bank); + static int workaround_enabled; void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(int off_mode)@@ -1318,6 +1324,7 @@ void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(int off_mode) struct gpio_bank *bank; list_for_each_entry(bank, &omap_gpio_list, node) { + struct platform_device *pdev; u32 l1 = 0, l2 = 0; int j;@@ -1334,7 +1341,7 @@ void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(int off_mode) * non-wakeup GPIOs. Otherwise spurious IRQs will be * generated. See OMAP2420 Errata item 1.101. */ if (!(bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios)) - continue; + goto save_gpio_ctx; if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx()) { bank->saved_datain = __raw_readl(bank->base +@@ -1372,6 +1379,12 @@ void omap2_gpio_prepare_for_idle(int off_mode) } c++; + +save_gpio_ctx: + pdev = to_platform_device(bank->dev); + bank->ctx_lost_cnt_before = + omap_device_get_context_loss_count(pdev);
Drivers should not be directly calling omap_device APIs. Instead, drivers should use a pdata function pointer to call device specific code for getting context loss. See OMAP HSMMC driver for an example on how this is done.
quoted hunk
+ omap_gpio_save_context(bank); } if (!c) { workaround_enabled = 0;@@ -1385,6 +1398,8 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void) struct gpio_bank *bank; list_for_each_entry(bank, &omap_gpio_list, node) { + u32 ctx_lost_cnt_after; + struct platform_device *pdev; u32 l = 0, gen, gen0, gen1; int j;@@ -1394,11 +1409,17 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void) for (j = 0; j < hweight_long(bank->dbck_enable_mask); j++) clk_enable(bank->dbck); - if (!workaround_enabled) + pdev = to_platform_device(bank->dev); + ctx_lost_cnt_after = omap_device_get_context_loss_count(pdev); + + if (ctx_lost_cnt_after == bank->ctx_lost_cnt_before) continue; + if (!workaround_enabled) + goto restore_gpio_ctx;
Now that these functions are all bank-specific, this 'workaround_enabled' flag should be made per-bank. That being said, do we even need this flag? I think that the combination of enabled_non_wakeup_gpios and whether or not context has been lost reflects the same condition.
quoted hunk
if (!(bank->enabled_non_wakeup_gpios)) - continue; + goto restore_gpio_ctx; if (cpu_is_omap24xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx()) { __raw_writel(bank->saved_fallingdetect,@@ -1472,117 +1493,104 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void) OMAP4_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1); } } + +restore_gpio_ctx: + omap_gpio_restore_context(bank);
After considering the placement of the restore context here, I don't
think it's quite right. It is equivalent to current behavior, but I'm
having a hard time understanding how current behavior is actually
working.
Consider the sequence
- prepare for idle
- remove triggering
- save edge-detect registers, then modify them to "workaround" values
- save context (w/ "workaround" edge-detect register values
- WFI, off-mode hit
- wakeup, resume from idle
- write "saved" values to edge-detect registers
- restore context
- here the "workaround" values from the saved context are restored !!!
so the "saved" values are now lost.
For this to be symmetric with the save, I think the restore context
should come before handling the workaround/hack.
Kevin