[PATCH 3/5] v2 seccomp_filters: Enable ftrace-based system call filtering

* Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 16:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

quoted

this is a security mechanism

Who says? [...]

Kernel developers/maintainers of the affected code.

We have security hooks all around the kernel, which can deny/accept execution 
at various key points, but we do not have 'execute arbitrary user-space defined 
(safe) scripts' callbacks in general.

But yes, if a particular callback point is defined widely enough to allow much 
bigger intervention into the flow of execution, then more is possible as well.

[...] and why would you want to unify two separate concepts only to them 
limit it to security that just doesn't make sense.

I don't limit them to security - the callbacks themselves are either for 
passive observation or, at most, for security accept/deny callbacks.

It's decided by the subsystem maintainers what kind of user-space control power 
(or observation power) they want to allow, not me.

I would just like to not stop the facility itself at the 'observe only' level, 
like you suggest.

Thanks,

	Ingo