[RFC PATCH v3 2/2] dt: add custom device creation to platform bus scan
From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-26 18:43:22
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Arnd, On 05/26/2011 08:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
From: Rob Herring<redacted> Add support to the platform bus scanning to call custom device creation functions. This enables creation of non-platform devices like amba_bus. Cc: Jeremy Kerr<redacted> Cc: Grant Likely<redacted> Cc: linux at arm.linux.org.uk Cc: arnd at arndb.de Cc: Linus Walleij<redacted> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring<redacted>This creates a confusing mix of match table entries: Normally, all entries in the match table are meant to identify child buses, but if I read your patch correctly, you now also need to match on the amba devices themselves, including the creation of platform devices for each child device node under an amba device.
We should only create devices for each matching bus and the immediate children of each bus. A child device of an amba device would be something like an i2c bus which we don't want to create devices for. Or am I missing something?
I don't think that was the intention. Maybe we need to pass two match tables into of_platform_bus_probe() instead: one to identify the buses, and another one that is used to create the actual devices.
That was my original thinking too, but some reason I had concluded 1
could get by with just 1 table. After more thought, I think you are
right. In fact, I broke platform device creation with this patch. I need
to be able to tell if no match means create a platform device (child of
bus) or not (child of a device).
Here's an updated version with just the interesting hunk. I've tested it
with a made up bus structure that looks something like this:
soc bus
-plat dev
-amba dev
-sub-bus
-plat dev
-amba dev
-plat dev
As of_platform_bus_probe is not recommended to be used by Grant, I only
plan to add 2 match tables to of_platform_bus_populate.
@@ -234,18 +237,32 @@ static int of_platform_bus_create(struct device_node *bus,
return 0;
}
- dev = of_platform_device_create(bus, NULL, parent);
- if (!dev || !of_match_node(matches, bus))
- return 0;
-
- for_each_child_of_node(bus, child) {
- pr_debug(" create child: %s\n", child->full_name);
- rc = of_platform_bus_create(child, matches, &dev->dev, strict);
- if (rc) {
- of_node_put(child);
- break;
+ id = of_match_node(bus_matches, bus);
+ if (id) {
+ dev = of_platform_device_create(bus, NULL, parent);
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
+ for_each_child_of_node(bus, child) {
+ pr_debug(" create child: %s\n", child->full_name);
+ rc = of_platform_bus_create(child, bus_matches,
+ dev_matches, dev, strict);
+ if (rc) {
+ of_node_put(child);
+ break;
+ }
}
+ return rc;
}
+
+ id = of_match_node(dev_matches, bus);
+ mdata = id ? id->data : NULL;
+ if (id && mdata && mdata->dev_create)
+ dev = mdata->dev_create(bus, parent);
+ else
+ dev = of_platform_device_create(bus, NULL, parent);
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
+
return rc;
}
Rob