Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 9 authors, 2011-05-25

[PATCH 2/2] drivers/amba: probe via device tree

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-25 09:07:21
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2011/5/24 Rob Herring [off-list ref]:
I think having "arm,amba-deviceid" is not needed. The current code does
nothing but warn if it doesn't match the h/w value. The drivers already have
a list of id's that they support and the amba bus only matches against the
h/w id value. The only use I can see is overriding a broken h/w value.
We have this usecase in the Ux500. See these patches:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6829/1
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6830/1

Alas, it's not yet merged for the old boardfile world usecase, and
causing us problems to drive our hardware already.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help