[RFC PATCH 2/2] ARMv7: Invalidate the TLB before freeing page tables
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2011-03-14 11:15:45
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 19:24 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 05:32:58PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:35 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:40:05PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
The above call to tlb_add_flush() would only add a PAGE_SIZE. But since we free an entire PTE, shouldn't the range cover addr .. addr+PTRS_PER_PTE*PAGE_SIZE?Why do we need to? We're not flushing away the individual PTE entries when we remove an entire page table - we will have already walked the page table removing those entries, which will already have been added.Ah, I missed the fact that tlb_flush() invalidates the whole TLB when there is no tlb->vma (the shift_arg_pages case). We could optimise this to add the range covered by the PTE page and avoid the !tlb->vma check (and a flush_tlb_mm), though not sure it's worth.If we're removing pte entries then tlb->vma is non-NULL. Please look at the comments - I've documented the three modes of use there along with how things are setup for each of those modes, and what we do with each.
Yes, I read them (they are useful) and I was only referring to point 3 in the comments, shift_arg_pages(). In this case tlb->vma is NULL and we flush the full mm in tlb_flush(). Can we have a smaller address range since we can get the from pte_free_tlb()? This would mean removing the !tlb->vma check in tlb_flush() and change tlb_add_flush() to take a range rather than just an address. -- Catalin