[PATCH v7 1/1] PRUSS UIO driver support
From: TK, Pratheesh Gangadhar <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-02 08:48:18
Also in:
lkml
Hi,
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx at linutronix.de] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 3:15 AMquoted
+ +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); +static struct clk *pruss_clk; +static struct uio_info *info; +static dma_addr_t sram_paddr, ddr_paddr; +static void *prussio_vaddr, *sram_vaddr, *ddr_vaddr; + +static irqreturn_t pruss_handler(int irq, struct uio_info *info) +{ + int intr_bit = (irq - IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0 + 2); + int val, intr_mask = (1 << intr_bit); + void __iomem *base = info->mem[0].internal_addr; + void __iomem *intren_reg = base + PINTC_HIER; + void __iomem *intrstat_reg = base + PINTC_HIPIR + (intr_bit << 2); + + spin_lock_irq(&lock);No, I said: spin_lock() is sufficient.
Ok.
quoted
+ val = ioread32(intren_reg); + /* Is interrupt enabled and active ? */ + if (!(val & intr_mask) && (ioread32(intrstat_reg) & HIPIR_NOPEND)) { + spin_unlock_irq(&lock);You unconditinally enable interrupts here where you are not supposed to do so.
Ok.
quoted
+ return IRQ_NONE; + } + + /* Disable interrupt */ + iowrite32((val & ~intr_mask), intren_reg);
I checked more on this and actually INTC h/w has Host Interrupt Enable Indexed Set Register (HIEISR) and Host Interrupt Enable Indexed Clear Register(HIEICR) which I can use to enable/disable interrupts without doing RMW. I will use these registers and then we don't need all the spinlock and irqcontrol stuff. So I need to do iowrite32((intr_bit, HIEICR);// This disable the interrupt bit in intern_reg. Userspace can use HIEISR to re-enable the interrupt.
quoted
+ spin_unlock_irq(&lock); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +static int pruss_irqcontrol(struct uio_info *info, s32 irq_on) +{ + int intr_bit = info->irq - IRQ_DA8XX_EVTOUT0 + 2; + int val, intr_mask = (1 << intr_bit); + void __iomem *base = info->mem[0].internal_addr; + void __iomem *intren_reg = base + PINTC_HIER; + + spin_lock_irq(&lock);This one is correct, as this is always called from non interrupt disabled context.quoted
+ val = ioread32(intren_reg); + if (irq_on) + iowrite32((val | intr_mask), intren_reg); + else + iowrite32((val & ~intr_mask), intren_reg); + spin_unlock_irq(&lock); + + return 0; +}quoted
+ + spin_lock_init(&lock);Sigh. DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); already initializes the lock. It's not the purpose of a review to tell you what you need to change mechanically. Reviewers hint to a correct solution and you are supposed to lookup what that solution means and act accordingly. If you do not understand the hint or its implications please ask _before_ sending a new patch set.
Seriously, I went to "fix the comments" mode. Sorry about that. Anyway I learnt more about things by making mistakes i.e. the positive side. Thanks a lot for helping us improve on this. Pratheesh