[PATCH 2/2] ARM i.MX23/28: Add framebuffer device support
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: 2011-02-21 14:18:42
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:36:23PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:26:50AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:17:18PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
I understand that "mxsfb" was picked up for the device name to reflect the driver name. But since this is the device under mach- mxs folder, can we simply call it "fb" just like the way you name fb.h? In this way, we have all mxs platform device naming schema aligned, auart, duart, dma, fb, fec, flexcan, mmc ...I see it the other way round. mach/fb.h is too generic, I would prefer mach/mxsfb.h to be able to add support for a different framebuffer later. So I better change fb.h to mxsfb.h.I'm fine with either way, but just wondering what kind of fb later it is and its naming, relatively to mxsfs.IPU...?AFAICT, this is something that never going to happen.
Just the first thing that came to my mind. It could also be the lcd controller known from i.MX1/2 Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |