Thread (62 messages) 62 messages, 9 authors, 2011-03-08

MMC quirks relating to performance/lifetime.

From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2011-02-18 13:44:24
Also in: linux-mmc

On Friday 18 February 2011, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Andrei Warkentin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Arnd,

Yes, this is a Toshiba card. I've sent the patch as a reply to Linus' email.

cid - 02010053454d3332479070cc51451d00
csd - d00f00320f5903ffffffffff92404000
erase_size - 524288
fwrev - 0x0
hwrev - 0x0
manfid - 0x000002
name - SEM32G
oemid - 0x0100
preferred_erase_size - 2097152
Ok. Big mistake. Sorry about that. This card is Sandisk card. I got
confused over all the manfids changing.

Here is the Toshiba card:

cid - 1101004d4d4333324703101a17746d00
csd - 900e00320f5903ffffffffe796400000
erase_size - 524288
fwrev - 0x0
hwrev - 0x0
manfid - 0x000011
name - MMC32G
oemid - 0x0100
preferred_erase_size - 4194304

I'll get you the flashbench timings for both.
I'm curious. Neither the manfid nor the oemid fields of either card
match what I have seen on SD cards, I would expect them to be

Sandisk: manfid 0x000003, oemid 0x5344
Toshiba: manfid 0x000002, oemid 0x544d

I have not actually seen any Toshiba SD cards, but I assume that they
use the same controllers as Kingston.

Does anyone know if the IDs have any correlation between MMC and SD
controllers?

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help