MMC quirks relating to performance/lifetime.
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2011-02-18 13:44:24
Also in:
linux-mmc
On Friday 18 February 2011, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Andrei Warkentin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Arnd, Yes, this is a Toshiba card. I've sent the patch as a reply to Linus' email. cid - 02010053454d3332479070cc51451d00 csd - d00f00320f5903ffffffffff92404000 erase_size - 524288 fwrev - 0x0 hwrev - 0x0 manfid - 0x000002 name - SEM32G oemid - 0x0100 preferred_erase_size - 2097152Ok. Big mistake. Sorry about that. This card is Sandisk card. I got confused over all the manfids changing. Here is the Toshiba card: cid - 1101004d4d4333324703101a17746d00 csd - 900e00320f5903ffffffffe796400000 erase_size - 524288 fwrev - 0x0 hwrev - 0x0 manfid - 0x000011 name - MMC32G oemid - 0x0100 preferred_erase_size - 4194304 I'll get you the flashbench timings for both.
I'm curious. Neither the manfid nor the oemid fields of either card match what I have seen on SD cards, I would expect them to be Sandisk: manfid 0x000003, oemid 0x5344 Toshiba: manfid 0x000002, oemid 0x544d I have not actually seen any Toshiba SD cards, but I assume that they use the same controllers as Kingston. Does anyone know if the IDs have any correlation between MMC and SD controllers? Arnd