Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2011-03-01

[PATCH 2/4] msm: iommu: Rework clock logic and add IOMMU bus clock control

From: Stepan Moskovchenko <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-25 22:10:00
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

On 2/24/2011 11:29 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
Hi Steve,
Hello
quoted
@@ -130,117 +131,134 @@ static int msm_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	struct resource *r, *r2;
  	struct clk *iommu_clk;
+	struct clk *iommu_pclk;
  	struct msm_iommu_drvdata *drvdata;
  	struct msm_iommu_dev *iommu_dev = pdev->dev.platform_data;
const please.
I am not clear on what you mean. Please be more specific here.
quoted
+	iommu_pclk = clk_get(NULL, "smmu_pclk");
+	if (IS_ERR(iommu_pclk)) {
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto fail;
+	}
I am not a big fan of this when you have the "device" around. You should just do

iommu_pclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);

...error logic...

iommu_clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iommu_clk");

...error logic...
The pclk is a "special" bus clock and does not have a specific device 
instance associated with it, so passing a device would not be 
appropriate in this case. I pass the device for other clocks that are 
indeed associated with devices, but this is not one of them. I suppose 
we could create 11 or 12 aliases for the pclk and associate it with all 
the IOMMU devices, but I would prefer to avoid doing that as I believe 
the current approach is cleaner.
quoted
-			ret = -EBUSY;
-			goto fail;
-		}
+	len = r->end - r->start + 1;
resource_size please.
Ok
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help