On Fri, Feb 11 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:

On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 12:28 -0800, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote:

quoted

Make the IOMMU platform data target-independent in
preparation for adding MSM8960 IOMMU support. The IOMMU
configuration on MSM8x60 and MSM8960 is identical and the
same platform data can be used for both.

Signed-off-by: Stepan Moskovchenko <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile                         |    4 +-
 .../{devices-msm8x60-iommu.c => devices-iommu.c}   |   54 +++++++++----------
 arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/msm_iomap-8x60.h    |   36 -------------
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
 rename arch/arm/mach-msm/{devices-msm8x60-iommu.c => devices-iommu.c} (93%)

If it's like what you and David are suggesting I think you would need a
SoC designation in the filename ..

It is functionality that will be shared across multiple socs.  Putting
the name of a specific soc would just be misleading.  Currently, it's
our only iommu.  Support for another family that uses a different iommu
could perhaps call it iommu2.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.