[PATCH] OMAP3: PM: fix save secure RAM to restore MPU power state
From: Tero.Kristo at nokia.com <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-26 09:27:03
Also in:
linux-omap
-----Original Message----- From: ext Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman at ti.com] Sent: 26 January, 2011 02:50 To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; Kristo Tero (Nokia-MS/Tampere) Subject: [PATCH] OMAP3: PM: fix save secure RAM to restore MPU power state Currently, on HS/EMU devices, MPU power state forced to on during PM init by the save secure RAM code. Rather than forcing the state of MPU powerdomain to on, simply read the current value and restore it after the ROM code has run. This only affects the !CPUidle case since when CPUidle is enabled, the MPU power state is dynamically changed by CPUidle. In the !CPUidle case, MPU power state is initialized once at init and never touched. Cc: Tero Kristo <redacted> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <redacted> --- If no objectsions, will be queued in my pm-fixes branch for 2.6.38-rc.
Looks good to me. Ack, if you need one.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 7 ++++--- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c index 8cbbead..1916038 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c@@ -168,9 +168,10 @@ static void omap3_core_restore_context(void) * once during boot sequence, but this works as we are not using secure * services. */ -static void omap3_save_secure_ram_context(u32 target_mpu_state) +static void omap3_save_secure_ram_context(void){ u32 ret; + int mpu_next_state = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm); if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP) { /*@@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ static void omap3_save_secure_ram_context(u32target_mpu_state) pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, PWRDM_POWER_ON); ret = _omap_save_secure_sram((u32 *) __pa(omap3_secure_ram_storage)); - pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, target_mpu_state); + pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pwrdm, mpu_next_state); /* Following is for error tracking, it should not happen */ if (ret) { printk(KERN_ERR "save_secure_sram() returns %08x\n",@@ -1094,7 +1095,7 @@ static int __init omap3_pm_init(void)local_fiq_disable(); omap_dma_global_context_save(); - omap3_save_secure_ram_context(PWRDM_POWER_ON); + omap3_save_secure_ram_context(); omap_dma_global_context_restore(); local_irq_enable(); -- 1.7.3.5