On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:27:24PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

quoted

At least another person did post results:

http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622 at pulham.picochip.com
http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622 at pulham.picochip.com

Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. ?I can't attach
a tested-by given to a different patch to this one.

quoted

quoted

That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels
(including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when run on
SMP capable hardware.

I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMHO. ?I
think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prevent SMP
from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selected.

The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable.

?Boot tested the 14 patch series ?with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled, on
?the following boards :


? 1. Omap2420 SDP

? 2. Omap2430 SDP

? 3. Omap3430 SDP

? 4. Omap4 Blaze

? Tested-by: Sourav Poddar [off-list ref]

Thanks. ?It's also important to ascertain which filesystems were tested -
could you let me know please?

It is a custom filesystem on BusyBox v1.17.2.
Please let me know if you need some other
information.