On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 23:52 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
quoted
quoted
Reverting: fs: rcu-walk aware d_revalidate method
commit: 34286d6662308d82aed891852d04c7c3a2649b16
I found that one, too, in the meantime. Currently debugging that with
tglx on irc.
The last finding is that parent and dentry in
nameidata_dentry_drop_rcu() are the same, which explains the lock
recursion nicely.
@nick: Anything you want us to add to the debugging ?
@peterz: Why does lockdep ignore the lock recursion in that
spin_lock_nested() call?
$ git show 34286d6662308d82aed891852d04c7c3a2649b16 | grep spin_lock_nested | wc -l
0
Uhm, whot?!