On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 +
Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169
+++++++++++++++++++++
How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm")
instead of "Documentation"?
Just a thought... ;-)
Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet.
It would be good to get some consensus before creating it.
I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space
tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were
moved to "tools/perf".
Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or
"tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-)
I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long
way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others
have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit
of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic.