[PATCH v2 06/10] ARM: mx28: update clocks for dual fec support
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-04 14:26:44
Also in:
netdev
Hi Uwe, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:58:18PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
Hello Shawn, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:24:12PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
Register clocks fec.0 and fec.1 for dual fec support. Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <redacted> --- Changes for v2: - Rebase the patch against patch below which gets fundamental clocks explicitly called in clk_enable. [PATCH v4] ARM: mxs: Change duart device to use amba-pl011 - Register clocks fec.0 and fec.1 respectively than use wildcard NULL for both instances. arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c index f20b254..f79587b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c@@ -607,6 +607,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = { /* for amba-pl011 driver */ _REGISTER_CLOCK("duart", NULL, uart_clk) _REGISTER_CLOCK("fec.0", NULL, fec_clk) + _REGISTER_CLOCK("fec.1", NULL, fec_clk)Did you verify this works as intended? I didn't and consider it possible that after clk_enable("fec.0"); clk_enable("fec.1"); clk_disable("fec.1"); the clk is off. Probably it just works, just want to prevent hard to find bugs ...
The clk should not be off. Looking at _REGISTER_CLOCK below, we are
registering both fec.0 and fec.1 on the same one fec_clk. IOW, the
usecount of the clk is working to control the on/off of the clk.
#define _REGISTER_CLOCK(d, n, c) \
{ \
.dev_id = d, \
.con_id = n, \
.clk = &c, \
},
--
Regards,
Shawn