On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
quoted
[ 75.280000] r5:be961ee4 r4:00063015
I started to bisect, but already the first test case showed a different
error (my getty dying every few seconds).
I bisected this one now, the first bad commit is
9c0729d (x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack tracing routines)
. It made a x86 specific change to include/linux/stacktrace.h.
As I said on IRC already, that's complete nonsense. The commit changes
a function prototype which is only relevant for x86. So how should
that affect ARM ?
According to tglx the lockup above "is related to nicks scalability
stuff". I havn't researched yet the offending commit. Is that
necessary?
Only if you are interested that the problem gets fixed.
Thanks,
tglx