[PATCH v4 7/7] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable coreoff if < ES1.2

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-omap-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nishanth Menon
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 4:24 AM
To: linux-omap; linux-arm
Cc: Jean Pihet; Kevin; Tony
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/7] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable coreoff if <
ES1.2

From: Eduardo Valentin <redacted>

Limitation i583: Self_Refresh Exit issue after OFF mode

Issue:
When device is waking up from OFF mode, then SDRC state machine sends
inappropriate sequence violating JEDEC standards.

Impact:
OMAP3630 < ES1.2 is impacted as follows depending on the platform:
CS0: for 38.4MHz as internal sysclk, DDR content seen to be stable,

while

quoted

? ? ? for all other sysclk frequencies, varied levels of instability
? ? ? seen based on varied parameters.
CS1: impacted

This patch takes option #3 as recommended by the Silicon erratum:
Avoid core power domain transitioning to OFF mode. Power consumption
impact is expected in this case.
To do this, we route core OFF requests to RET request on the impacted
revisions of silicon.

[nm at ti.com: rebased the code to 2.6.37-rc2- short circuit code changed a
bit]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <redacted>
---
v4: idle state control changed a bit -we wont register or enable
? ? the states which cannot be enabled.
v3: http://marc.info/?t=129140247800027&r=1&w=2
? ? no functional change in erratum wa implementation, just registration
of
? ? ? erratum is collated to a single cpu detection and version check
v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/365262/
? ? rebased to this patch series instead of depending on hs changes
? ? fix typo for macro definition
v1: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129013173425266&w=2
?arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | ? 10 ++++++++++
?arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 +
?arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c ? ? ?| ? 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
?3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-

omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
index f80d3f6..1b32e98 100644

--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c

@@ -453,6 +453,16 @@ void omap_init_power_states(void)

? ? ? omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C7].core_state = PWRDM_POWER_OFF;
? ? ? omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C7].flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID

|

quoted

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? CPUIDLE_FLAG_CHECK_BM;
+
+ ? ? /*
+ ? ? ?* Erratum i583: implementation for ES rev < Es1.2 on 3630. We
cannot
+ ? ? ?* enable OFF mode in a stable form for previous revisions.
+ ? ? ?* we disable C7 state as a result.
+ ? ? ?*/
+ ? ? if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? omap3_power_states[OMAP3_STATE_C7].valid = 0;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? cpuidle_params_table[OMAP3_STATE_C7].valid = 0;

WARN_ONCE in IDLE also would be good.

Agree on the WARN_ONCE remarks.

Other than that:
Acked-by: Jean Pihet <redacted>

quoted

+ ? ? }
?}

?struct cpuidle_driver omap3_idle_driver = {

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
index 92ef400..9032d09 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h

@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ extern unsigned int omap24xx_cpu_suspend_sz;

?extern unsigned int omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz;

?#define PM_RTA_ERRATUM_i608 ? ? ? ? ?(1 << 0)
+#define PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583 ?(1 << 1)

?#if defined(CONFIG_PM) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3)
?extern u16 pm34xx_errata;

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index 21cd36e..7faea55 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c

@@ -928,12 +928,28 @@ void omap3_pm_off_mode_enable(int enable)

? ? ? ? ? ? ? state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;

?#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
- ? ? omap3_cpuidle_update_states(state, state);
+ ? ? /*
+ ? ? ?* Erratum i583: implementation for ES rev < Es1.2 on 3630. We
cannot
+ ? ? ?* enable OFF mode in a stable form for previous revisions,

restrict

quoted

+ ? ? ?* instead to RET
+ ? ? ?*/
+ ? ? if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583))
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? omap3_cpuidle_update_states(state, PWRDM_POWER_RET);
+ ? ? else
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? omap3_cpuidle_update_states(state, state);
?#endif

? ? ? list_for_each_entry(pwrst, &pwrst_list, node) {
- ? ? ? ? ? ? pwrst->next_state = state;
- ? ? ? ? ? ? omap_set_pwrdm_state(pwrst->pwrdm, state);
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583) &&
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pwrst->pwrdm == core_pwrdm &&
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pwrst->next_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pr_err("%s: Core OFF disabled due to errata

i583\n",
Shoud we do this in every iteration or just WARN_ONCE do ??

quoted

+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? __func__);
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? } else {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pwrst->next_state = state;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? }
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? omap_set_pwrdm_state(pwrst->pwrdm, pwrst->next_state);
? ? ? }
?}

@@ -1011,6 +1027,8 @@ static void __init pm_errata_configure(void)

? ? ? ? ? ? ? pm34xx_errata |= PM_RTA_ERRATUM_i608;
? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Enable the l2 cache toggling in sleep logic */
? ? ? ? ? ? ? enable_omap3630_toggle_l2_on_restore();
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? if (omap_rev() < OMAP3630_REV_ES1_2)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pm34xx_errata |= PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583;
? ? ? }
?}

--
1.6.3.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html