Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2010-10-19

[PATCHv2] cpufreq for freescale mx51

From: Yong Shen <hidden>
Date: 2010-10-18 05:43:43

Hi Sascha,

Thanks for your thorough review. I have two feedbacks to your commends.
Sorry for delayed response, cause I had a hard time due to my computer crash
and data loss.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
quoted
index 2d37785..83add9c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mx5/cpu.c
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ static int cpu_silicon_rev = -1;

 #define SI_REV 0x48

+struct cpu_wp *(*get_cpu_wp)(int *wp);
+
This is not needed.

This is needed, otherwise it does not pass compile.
quoted
+             return ret;
+     }
+
+     cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(imx_freq_table, policy->cpu);
+     return 0;
+}
+
+static int mxc_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+     cpufreq_frequency_table_put_attr(policy->cpu);
+
+     /* Reset CPU to 665MHz */
+     set_cpu_freq(arm_normal_clk);
arm_normal_clk is initialized to cpu_freq_khz_max * 1000 and never touched
again. It would be clearer here to remove arm_normal_clk and write
cpu_freq_khz_max * 1000 directly here. Then you can also remove the
comment which is wrong for most i.MXs, even for the i.MX51.
Actually, this is arm_normal_clk is touched later in mxc_cpufreq_exit()
fuction.

Yong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20101018/9e3e23a6/attachment-0001.html>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help