From: Vikram Pandita <redacted>

For OMAP24xx/34xx/44xx: omap_type() returns the correct type:
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_TEST
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_EMU
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_SEC
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP
 OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_BAD

In current implementation there are two problems:
Problem 1:
For 34xx, the current if check will never return true.

Problem 2:
For 24xx the correct type check should be with omap_type() function
Verified by checking the TRM 24xx for CONTROL_STATUS register bits

Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <redacted>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c |   11 +----------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
index 10b3b4c..1faaa6e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c

@@ -93,16 +93,7 @@ extern unsigned long omapfb_reserve_sram(unsigned long sram_pstart,
  */
 static int is_sram_locked(void)
 {
-	int type = 0;
-
-	if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
-		/* Not yet supported */
-		return 0;
-
-	if (cpu_is_omap242x())
-		type = omap_rev() & OMAP2_DEVICETYPE_MASK;
-
-	if (type == GP_DEVICE) {
+	if (OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP == omap_type()) {
 		/* RAMFW: R/W access to all initiators for all qualifier sets */
 		if (cpu_is_omap242x()) {
 			__raw_writel(0xFF, OMAP24XX_VA_REQINFOPERM0); /* all q-vects */

-- 
1.6.0.4