Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 4 authors, 2010-09-21
STALE5748d

[PATCH 1/6] pxa3xx_nand: make scan procedure more clear

From: Lei Wen <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-13 11:56:14

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Eric Miao [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Haojian Zhuang
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
From: Lei Wen <redacted>

Signed-off-by: Lei Wen <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <redacted>
Cc: Eric Miao <redacted>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
---
?drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | ? 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
?1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
index 5d24968..3468a3d 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct pxa3xx_nand_info {
? ? ? ?unsigned int ? ? ? ? ? ?buf_start;
? ? ? ?unsigned int ? ? ? ? ? ?buf_count;

+ ? ? ? struct mtd_info ? ? ? ? *mtd;
? ? ? ?/* DMA information */
? ? ? ?int ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? drcmr_dat;
? ? ? ?int ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? drcmr_cmd;
@@ -1044,21 +1045,13 @@ static void pxa3xx_nand_init_mtd(struct mtd_info *mtd,
? ? ? ?this->chip_delay = 25;
?}

-static int pxa3xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev)
?{
- ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data *pdata;
+ ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
? ? ? ?struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info;
- ? ? ? struct nand_chip *this;
? ? ? ?struct mtd_info *mtd;
? ? ? ?struct resource *r;
- ? ? ? int ret = 0, irq;
-
- ? ? ? pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
-
- ? ? ? if (!pdata) {
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data defined\n");
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENODEV;
- ? ? ? }
+ ? ? ? int ret, irq;

? ? ? ?mtd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mtd_info) + sizeof(struct pxa3xx_nand_info),
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1070,8 +1063,8 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
? ? ? ?info = (struct pxa3xx_nand_info *)(&mtd[1]);
? ? ? ?info->pdev = pdev;

- ? ? ? this = &info->nand_chip;
? ? ? ?mtd->priv = info;
+ ? ? ? info->mtd = mtd;
? ? ? ?mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;

? ? ? ?info->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
@@ -1149,27 +1142,9 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
? ? ? ?}

? ? ? ?pxa3xx_nand_init_mtd(mtd, info);
+ ? ? ? platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);

- ? ? ? platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtd);
-
- ? ? ? if (nand_scan(mtd, 1)) {
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to scan nand\n");
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = -ENXIO;
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto fail_free_irq;
- ? ? ? }
-
- ? ? ? if (mtd_has_cmdlinepart()) {
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? static const char *probes[] = { "cmdlinepart", NULL };
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct mtd_partition *parts;
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? int nr_parts;
-
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? nr_parts = parse_mtd_partitions(mtd, probes, &parts, 0);
-
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (nr_parts)
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return add_mtd_partitions(mtd, parts, nr_parts);
- ? ? ? }
-
- ? ? ? return add_mtd_partitions(mtd, pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts);
+ ? ? ? return 0;

?fail_free_irq:
? ? ? ?free_irq(irq, info);
@@ -1194,8 +1169,8 @@ fail_free_mtd:
?static int pxa3xx_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
?{
- ? ? ? struct mtd_info *mtd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = mtd->priv;
+ ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ ? ? ? struct mtd_info *mtd = info->mtd;
? ? ? ?struct resource *r;
? ? ? ?int irq;
@@ -1224,11 +1199,48 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
? ? ? ?return 0;
?}

+static int pxa3xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data *pdata;
+ ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info;
+ ? ? ? int ret;
+
+ ? ? ? pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
+ ? ? ? if (!pdata) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data defined\n");
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENODEV;
+ ? ? ? }
+
+ ? ? ? ret = alloc_nand_resource(pdev);
Hrm... I'd rather this being something like:

? ? ? ?info = alloc_nand_info(pdev);
? ? ? ?if (info == NULL)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?blah ... blah ...

Otherwise looks all good to me.
That make sense.
How about the other five patches.  :-)

Thanks,
Lei
quoted
+ ? ? ? if (ret)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return ret;
+
+ ? ? ? info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ ? ? ? if (nand_scan(info->mtd, 1)) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to scan nand\n");
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pxa3xx_nand_remove(pdev);
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -ENODEV;
+ ? ? ? }
+
+ ? ? ? if (mtd_has_cmdlinepart()) {
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? static const char *probes[] = { "cmdlinepart", NULL };
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct mtd_partition *parts;
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? int nr_parts;
+
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? nr_parts = parse_mtd_partitions(info->mtd, probes, &parts, 0);
+
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (nr_parts)
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return add_mtd_partitions(info->mtd, parts, nr_parts);
+ ? ? ? }
+
+ ? ? ? return add_mtd_partitions(info->mtd, pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts);
+}
+
?#ifdef CONFIG_PM
?static int pxa3xx_nand_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
?{
- ? ? ? struct mtd_info *mtd = (struct mtd_info *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = mtd->priv;
+ ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ ? ? ? struct mtd_info *mtd = info->mtd;

? ? ? ?if (info->state != STATE_READY) {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?dev_err(&pdev->dev, "driver busy, state = %d\n", info->state);
@@ -1240,8 +1252,8 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
?static int pxa3xx_nand_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
?{
- ? ? ? struct mtd_info *mtd = (struct mtd_info *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = mtd->priv;
+ ? ? ? struct pxa3xx_nand_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ ? ? ? struct mtd_info *mtd = info->mtd;

? ? ? ?nand_writel(info, NDTR0CS0, info->ndtr0cs0);
? ? ? ?nand_writel(info, NDTR1CS0, info->ndtr1cs0);
--
1.7.0.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help