Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 4 authors, 2010-08-31
STALE5781d

[PATCH] input/touch: Introduce the LPC32xx touchscreen controller driver (v2)

From: Ryan Mallon <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-16 22:09:12
Also in: linux-input

On 08/17/2010 09:21 AM, wellsk40 at gmail.com wrote:
From: Kevin Wells <redacted>

This patch set introduces support for the LPC32xx touchscreen
controller driver. The LPC32xx touchscreen controller supports
automated event detection and X/Y data conversion for resistive
touchscreens.
Hi Kevin,

A few comments below.
+
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_IRQ_TO_FIFO_4	(0x1 << 11)
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_X_SAMPLE_SIZE(s)	((10 - (s)) << 7)
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_Y_SAMPLE_SIZE(s)	((10 - (s)) << 4)
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_POWER_UP		(1 << 2)
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_AUTO_EN		(1 << 0)
+
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO_TS_P_LEVEL		(1 << 31)
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO_NORMALIZE_X_VAL(x)	(((x) & 0x03FF0000) >> 16)
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO_NORMALIZE_Y_VAL(y)	((y) & 0x000003FF)
Some of these names are really long which causes lots of line breaks in
the code. Can you shorten some of the names to make it more readable.
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_ADCDAT_VALUE_MASK		0x000003FF
+
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_MIN_XY_VAL			0x0
+#define LPC32XX_TSC_MAX_XY_VAL			0x3FF
+
+#define MOD_NAME "ts-lpc32xx"
+
+#define tsc_readl(dev, reg) \
+	__raw_readl((dev)->tsc_base + (reg))
+#define tsc_writel(dev, reg, val) \
+	__raw_writel((val), (dev)->tsc_base + (reg))
inline functions are better for this sort of thing.
+
+struct lpc32xx_tsc {
+	struct input_dev *dev;
+	void __iomem *tsc_base;
+	int irq;
+	struct clk *clk;
+};
(Nitpicky) Tab delimit this to make it a bit more readable.
+static void lpc32xx_fifo_clear(struct lpc32xx_tsc *tsc)
+{
+	while (!(tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_STAT) &
+			   LPC32XX_TSC_STAT_FIFO_EMPTY))
+		tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO);
+}
The FIFO_EMTPY bit gets used a couple of times, so maybe:

	static inline tsc_fifo_empty(struct lpc32xx_tsc *tsc)
	{
		return tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_STAT) &
			         LPC32XX_TSC_STAT_FIFO_EMPTY;
	}

Also, is it worth having a timeout on that while loop so that if the i2c
bus dies or something that you don't get stuck there forever?
+static irqreturn_t lpc32xx_ts_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	u32 tmp, rv[4], xs[4], ys[4];
+	int idx;
+	struct lpc32xx_tsc *tsc = dev_id;
+	struct input_dev *input = tsc->dev;
+
+	tmp = tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_STAT);
+
+	if (tmp & LPC32XX_TSC_STAT_FIFO_OVRRN) {
+		/* FIFO overflow - throw away samples */
Should there be a dev_err/warn here to let the user know?
+		lpc32xx_fifo_clear(tsc);
+		return IRQ_HANDLED;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Gather and normalize 4 samples. Pen-up events may have less
+	 * than 4 samples, but its ok to pop 4 and let the last sample
+	 * pen status check drop the samples.
+	 */
+	idx = 0;
+	while ((idx < 4) &&
+		(!(tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_STAT) &
+			     LPC32XX_TSC_STAT_FIFO_EMPTY))) {
	for (idx = 0; idx < 4 && !tsc_fifo_empty(); idx++) {
		...

Is a bit more readable.
+		tmp = tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO);
+		xs[idx] = LPC32XX_TSC_ADCDAT_VALUE_MASK -
+			LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO_NORMALIZE_X_VAL(tmp);
+		ys[idx] = LPC32XX_TSC_ADCDAT_VALUE_MASK -
+			LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO_NORMALIZE_Y_VAL(tmp);
+		rv[idx] = tmp;
+		idx++;
+	}
+
+	/* Data is only valid if pen is still down in last sample */
+	if ((!(rv[3] & LPC32XX_TSC_FIFO_TS_P_LEVEL)) && (idx == 4)) {
+		/* Use average of 2nd and 3rd sample for position */
+		input_report_abs(input, ABS_X, ((xs[1] + xs[2]) / 2));
+		input_report_abs(input, ABS_Y, ((ys[1] + ys[2]) / 2));
+		input_report_key(input, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
+	} else {
+		input_report_key(input, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
+	}
+
+	input_sync(input);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void lpc32xx_stop_tsc(struct lpc32xx_tsc *tsc)
+{
+	/* Disable auto mode */
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_CON,
+		   tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_CON) &
+			     ~LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_AUTO_EN);
+
+	clk_disable(tsc->clk);
+}
+
+static void lpc32xx_setup_tsc(struct lpc32xx_tsc *tsc)
+{
+	u32 tmp;
+
+	clk_enable(tsc->clk);
+
+	tmp = tsc_readl(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_CON) & ~LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_POWER_UP;
+
+	/* Set the TSC FIFO depth to 4 samples @ 10-bits per sample (max) */
+	tmp = (LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_IRQ_TO_FIFO_4 |
+		LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_X_SAMPLE_SIZE(10) |
+		LPC32XX_TSC_ADCCON_Y_SAMPLE_SIZE(10));
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_CON, tmp);
+
+	/* These values are all preset */
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_SEL, LPC32XX_TSC_SEL_DEFVAL);
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_MIN_X, LPC32XX_TSC_MIN_XY_VAL);
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_MAX_X, LPC32XX_TSC_MAX_XY_VAL);
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_MIN_Y, LPC32XX_TSC_MIN_XY_VAL);
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_MAX_Y, LPC32XX_TSC_MAX_XY_VAL);
+
+	/* Aux support is not used */
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_AUX_UTR, 0);
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_AUX_MIN, 0);
+	tsc_writel(tsc, LPC32XX_TSC_AUX_MAX, 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Set sample rate to about 240Hz per X/Y pair. A single measurement
+	 * consists of 4 pairs which gives about a 60Hz sample rate based on
+	 * a stable 32768Hz clock source. Values are in clocks.
+	 * Rate is (32768 / (RTR + XCONV + RTR + YCONV + DXP + TTR + UTR) / 4
+	 */
Is the clock source internal, or at least always 32.768kHz? If not,
should the timing be controlled via some platform data so that this
driver is compatible with other board setups?

~Ryan

-- 
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon         		5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan at bluewatersys.com         	PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com	New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127		Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax:   +64 3 3779135			  USA 1800 261 2934
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help