On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:40:19AM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I've outlined a far simpler and easiler solution
which avoids this kind of abuse, and given suggestions on how to extend
it to support multiple instances.
Do you mean:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg95338.html
?
I was under the impression you eventually discarded that approach in
that post.
Indeed.
I'm talking about my first suggestion:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100804.114148.bf961e83.en.html
which was later expanded by Vitaly:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100804.140119.f476c29c.en.html
I don't think anyone had any negative comments against that proposal.