B Bahadir Balban #
Message details and related content
There's a call to cpu_get_pgd() from do_translation_fault()
that reads the TTBR to reach the pgd pointer.
Why not use pgd_offset(current->mm, addr)?
Thanks,
--
BahadirStarted by Bahadir Balban on Aug 5, 2010 · 2 messages from 2 authors · Last reply Aug 5, 2010
open the first message on its own page
B Bahadir Balban #
There's a call to cpu_get_pgd() from do_translation_fault()
that reads the TTBR to reach the pgd pointer.
Why not use pgd_offset(current->mm, addr)?
Thanks,
--
BahadirR Russell King - ARM Linux replied to Bahadir Balban #
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:23:46PM +0300, Bahadir Balban wrote:
There's a call to cpu_get_pgd() from do_translation_fault() that reads the TTBR to reach the pgd pointer. Why not use pgd_offset(current->mm, addr)?
Because current->mm might not refer to the page table which is currently being used by the hardware. Think about this sequence: task = current schedule() next = some_other_task switch_mm(next) IRQ occurs, handler is in a module which is unmapped in next's mm but exists in task's mm prefetch fault occurs Now at this point, if we look at current->mm, we find that the entry exists. If we used this, and just returned, we'd repeat the prefetch fault, and make no progress. So we have to read the page tables which the hardware is currently using to ensure that we update the right set of page tables.