On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:30 PM, David Woodhouse [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 12:18 -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:

quoted

Out of curiosity, why fall back to one chunk at a time? ?It seems to
me that IMAP should be able to still support multiple outstanding
requests in that case, but you'd just get errors on the latter chunks.

It is just that there was no point optimizing the workaround case?

There wasn't a lot of point in optimising it.

Say no more :)

I code on some IMAP clients occasionally and I just wanted to make
sure I wasn't missing something important.

Thanks!

Avery