On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:11:26PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:

Dne ?t 26. listopadu 2009 20:18:40 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):

quoted

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 08:13:47PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:

quoted

Why don't we separate the common MFP configuration into another table as
some platforms do ? The code duplication is horrible here ...

Please read the comments on the previous patch series for this.

So is it your preference or is there any valid argument to support your way ?

The original way was to have many small tables setting up the MFP
according to which devices were going to be registered.

Mike suggested to have one common table and a per-board table, but the
response was that this could lead to duplications and other similar
problems.

So I suggested the obvious alternative solution which solves all the
stated issues.

So not really a preference nor supported by a pressing reason.  Merely
just a solution which makes all the currently stated issues go away.