Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 5 authors, 2009-11-30

kernel BUG at kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c:1389!

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-02 16:54:41

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
in arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam926x_time.c +125
 .flags = IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL,

IRQF_DISABLED is positionned. But on the other hand, I saw in the kernel
booting messages that:
"IRQ 1/rtc0: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs"

What does this mean ? what is the difference with former way of managing
shared interrupts ?
If the first IRQ action which is run was registered without IRQF_DISABLED
the entire set will be run without interrupts disabled.
And above all, what is the proper way to set an IRQ on a shared
interrupt line ?
The only real solution is to ensure that all requesters use IRQF_DISABLED.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help