Possible suspend/resume regression in .32-rc?
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-02 10:51:44
Also in:
lkml
On Mon 2009-11-02 06:48:28, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon 2009-11-02 05:22:30, Haojian Zhuang wrote:quoted
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Pavel Machek [off-list ref] wrote: Em, it's not caused by the IRQ patch. The kernel is blocked in resume path. When console is resumed, IRQ is already disabled and system is blocked. Actually, IRQ shouldn't be disabled at here. Up to now, I only find which patch will cause this issue. But I can't find the best solution on it. The patch with issue is pasted in below. So this issue is only occused when console suspend is enabled. If you enable no_console_suspend in command, you won't meet this issue. It seems that it's caused by removing termios setting in uart_resume_port() in the below patch. If I add these code back, the issue doesn't occur any more.Given that it hangs very early, in arch_suspend_enable_irqs() (see my other mail), I don't trust your analysis. I'm not using serial console on spitz, and I have never had successful resume with the patch applied.It seems that we're talking on different issue with similar symptom. Please check my test method. While I'm testing suspend with devices level, kernel is blocked in console resume. In this level, it won't call arch_suspend_enable_irqs(). This function call is only invoked in processor level or below.
For me, everything but real suspend works. I do _not_ have serial console for spitz.
Up to now, I can't reproduce the issue you're talking on my platform yet. I'll check this issue continuously. I also want to know your hardware information.
Spitz, aka Sharp Zaurus c3000. Can we get the patch reverted till its fixed, so other development can continue? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html