[PATCH] Don't disable irqs in set_next_event and set_mode callbacks
From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-21 09:16:14
From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2009-09-21 09:16:14
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:39:22AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:quoted
These functions are called with irqs already off. at91rm2000 had a WARN_ON_ONCE if irqs were enabled since Nov 2008 with noone reporting having hit it.It might be useful to document these clockevent interfaces. There's at least a few ARM clockevent implementations which don't set the periodic interval when set_next_event() is called - probably because it wasn't realised that it was required.
I'm a bit confused now as AFAIK set_next_event isn't called in periodic mode. You mean they don't start the timer if mode==CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC in .set_mode? It looks as if pxa is such an implementation, it does nothing in this case. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |