Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 3 authors, 2021-10-26

Re: [PATCH 2/7] stacktrace,sched: Make stack_trace_save_tsk() more robust

From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2021-10-22 16:54:40
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:25:02AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 05:09:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
Recent patches to get_wchan() made it more robust by only doing the
unwind when the task was blocked and serialized against wakeups.

Extract this functionality as a simpler companion to task_call_func()
named task_try_func() that really only cares about blocked tasks. Then
employ this new function to implement the same robustness for
ARCH_STACKWALK based stack_trace_save_tsk().

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/wait.h |    1 
 kernel/sched/core.c  |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/stacktrace.c  |   13 ++++++----
 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -1162,5 +1162,6 @@ int autoremove_wake_function(struct wait
 
 typedef int (*task_call_f)(struct task_struct *p, void *arg);
 extern int task_call_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg);
+extern int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg);
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_WAIT_H */
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1966,21 +1966,21 @@ bool sched_task_on_rq(struct task_struct
 	return task_on_rq_queued(p);
 }
 
+static int try_get_wchan(struct task_struct *p, void *arg)
+{
+	unsigned long *wchan = arg;
ke> > +	*wchan = __get_wchan(p);
quoted
+	return 0;
+}
+
 unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	unsigned long ip = 0;
-	unsigned int state;
 
 	if (!p || p == current)
 		return 0;
 
-	/* Only get wchan if task is blocked and we can keep it that way. */
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
-	state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
-	smp_rmb(); /* see try_to_wake_up() */
-	if (state != TASK_RUNNING && state != TASK_WAKING && !p->on_rq)
-		ip = __get_wchan(p);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);
+	task_try_func(p, try_get_wchan, &ip);
 
 	return ip;
 }
@@ -4184,6 +4184,52 @@ int task_call_func(struct task_struct *p
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * task_try_func - Invoke a function on task in blocked state
+ * @p: Process for which the function is to be invoked
+ * @func: Function to invoke
+ * @arg: Argument to function
+ *
+ * Fix the task in a blocked state, when possible. And if so, invoke @func on it.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  -EBUSY or whatever @func returns
+ */
+int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int state;
+	int ret = -EBUSY;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure we load p->on_rq after p->__state, otherwise it would be
+	 * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0.
+	 *
+	 * See try_to_wake_up() for a longer comment.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
+	/*
+	 * Since pi->lock blocks try_to_wake_up(), we don't need rq->lock when
+	 * the task is blocked. Make sure to check @state since ttwu() can drop
+	 * locks at the end, see ttwu_queue_wakelist().
+	 */
+	if (state != TASK_RUNNING && state != TASK_WAKING && !p->on_rq) {
+		/*
+		 * The task is blocked and we're holding off wakeupsr. For any
+		 * of the other task states, see task_call_func().
+		 */
+		ret = func(p, arg);
+	}
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * wake_up_process - Wake up a specific process
  * @p: The process to be woken up.
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -123,6 +123,13 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save(unsigned l
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_trace_save);
 
+static int try_arch_stack_walk_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, void *arg)
+{
+	stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry = stack_trace_consume_entry_nosched;
+	arch_stack_walk(consume_entry, arg, tsk, NULL);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * stack_trace_save_tsk - Save a task stack trace into a storage array
  * @task:	The task to examine
@@ -135,7 +142,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_trace_save);
 unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *store,
 				  unsigned int size, unsigned int skipnr)
 {
-	stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry = stack_trace_consume_entry_nosched;
 	struct stacktrace_cookie c = {
 		.store	= store,
 		.size	= size,
@@ -143,11 +149,8 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct
 		.skip	= skipnr + (current == tsk),
 	};
 
-	if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk))
-		return 0;
+	task_try_func(tsk, try_arch_stack_walk_tsk, &c);
Pardon my thin understanding of the scheduler, but I assume this change
doesn't mean stack_trace_save_tsk() stops working for "current", right?
In trying to answer this for myself, I couldn't convince myself what value
current->__state have here. Is it one of TASK_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE ?
Regardless of that, current->on_rq will be non-zero, so you're right that this
causes stack_trace_save_tsk() to not work for current, e.g.

| # cat /proc/self/stack 
| # wc  /proc/self/stack 
|         0         0         0 /proc/self/stack

TBH, I think that (taking a step back from this issue in particular)
stack_trace_save_tsk() *shouldn't* work for current, and callers *should* be
forced to explicitly handle current separately from blocked tasks.

So we could fix this in the stacktrace code with:

| diff --git a/kernel/stacktrace.c b/kernel/stacktrace.c
| index a1cdbf8c3ef8..327af9ff2c55 100644
| --- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
| +++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
| @@ -149,7 +149,10 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *store,
|                 .skip   = skipnr + (current == tsk),
|         };
|  
| -       task_try_func(tsk, try_arch_stack_walk_tsk, &c);
| +       if (tsk == current)
| +               try_arch_stack_walk_tsk(tsk, &c);
| +       else
| +               task_try_func(tsk, try_arch_stack_walk_tsk, &c);
|  
|         return c.len;
|  }

... and we could rename task_try_func() to blocked_task_try_func(), and
later push the distinction into higher-level callers.

Alternatively, we could do:

| diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
| index a8be6e135c57..cef9e35ecf2f 100644
| --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
| +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
| @@ -4203,6 +4203,11 @@ int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg)
|  
|         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
|  
| +       if (p == current) {
| +               ret = func(p, arg);
| +               goto out;
| +       }
| +
|         state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
|  
|         /*
| @@ -4226,6 +4231,7 @@ int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg)
|                 ret = func(p, arg);
|         }
|  
| +out:
|         raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
|         return ret;
|  }

... which perhaps is aligned with smp_call_function_single() and
generic_exec_single().

Thanks,
Mark.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help