Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 6 authors, 2022-02-14

Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] powerpc: Prepare func_desc_t for refactorisation

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-18 07:09:22
Also in: linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml


Le 18/10/2021 à 08:27, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of October 17, 2021 10:38 pm:
quoted
In preparation of making func_desc_t generic, change the ELFv2
version to a struct containing 'addr' element.

This allows using single helpers common to ELFv1 and ELFv2.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
quoted
---
  arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
index a89da0ee25e2..b687ef88c4c4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
@@ -33,19 +33,13 @@
  #ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2
  
  /* An address is simply the address of the function. */
-typedef unsigned long func_desc_t;
+typedef struct {
+	unsigned long addr;
+} func_desc_t;
I'm not quite following why this change is done. I guess it is so you
can move this func_desc_t type into core code, but why do that? Is it
just to avoid using the preprocessor?
I explained it in patch 7 but yes it probably also deserves some more 
explanation here as well.

That's right, it's to avoid having to spread #ifdefs everywhere.
On its own this patch looks okay.

Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help