Re: [PATCH v1 09/10] lkdtm: Fix lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA()
From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-13 07:35:40
Also in:
linux-mm, linuxppc-dev, lkml
Le 13/10/2021 à 09:09, Kees Cook a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:quoted
Behind a location, lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA() executes a real function, not a copy of do_nothing(). So do it directly instead of using execute_location().I don't understand this. Why does the next patch not fix this?
Well, probably it would, but it looked incorrect in my mind. lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing() is a function which has its own function descriptor, it is not a copy of do_nothing(). If we use execute_location() as modified by next patch, then we will execute it using the function descriptor of do_nothing(). Allthough it most likely works (at least on powerpc as it uses the same TOC) it looks odd to me to do so. Am I missing something ? Christophe
-Keesquoted
And fix displayed addresses by dereferencing the function descriptors. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted> --- drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c index 442d60ed25ef..da16564e1ecd 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/perms.c@@ -153,7 +153,14 @@ void lkdtm_EXEC_VMALLOC(void) void lkdtm_EXEC_RODATA(void) { - execute_location(lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing, CODE_AS_IS); + pr_info("attempting ok execution at %px\n", + dereference_symbol_descriptor(do_nothing)); + do_nothing(); + + pr_info("attempting bad execution at %px\n", + dereference_symbol_descriptor(lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing)); + lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing(); + pr_err("FAIL: func returned\n"); } void lkdtm_EXEC_USERSPACE(void)-- 2.31.1